Selecting the right point-of-sale (POS) system is more important than ever as restaurants face new challenges in 2025. Toast and Square continue to dominate the market, each bringing distinct strengths for food service operators looking to upgrade or launch their business. With industry standards evolving and customer expectations rising, comparing these platforms closely will help you invest in technology that truly supports your restaurant’s growth and daily operations.
Toast and Square represent fundamentally different philosophies in restaurant technology. Toast was engineered exclusively for restaurants, with every feature designed around food service workflows and kitchen environments. This laser focus on restaurant operations translates into specialized tools for everything from complex order modifications to kitchen timing optimization. Square took a different path, starting as a versatile payment solution before expanding into restaurant-specific features, creating a more adaptable system that serves multiple industries effectively.
The specialization difference becomes apparent in day-to-day operations. Toast’s restaurant-first approach delivers deeper functionality for complex dining scenarios, advanced kitchen management, and industry-specific reporting that helps optimize food costs and labor efficiency. Square’s broader foundation provides excellent flexibility and cross-industry compatibility, making it particularly valuable for businesses that combine restaurant operations with retail sales or those exploring different service models.
This philosophical difference influences pricing structures, hardware requirements, and feature development priorities. Restaurant owners must evaluate whether they need Toast’s specialized depth or would benefit more from Square’s versatile approach and budget-friendly options.
Restaurant environments demand technology that can withstand heat, humidity, spills, and constant use. Toast’s hardware lineup reflects this reality with purpose-built terminals designed specifically for food service durability. The Toast Flex terminal, Toast Go 2 handhelds, and kitchen display systems are engineered to handle grease, moisture, and the physical demands of busy restaurant operations. This specialized construction comes with premium pricing, with the Toast Flex starting around $719 plus ongoing monthly fees.
Square offers more budget-conscious hardware options that prioritize affordability over restaurant-specific durability. Their hardware ecosystem includes the Square Register ($799), Square Terminal ($299), Square Stand for iPads ($149), and basic card readers starting at $49. While not specifically hardened for restaurant environments, Square’s equipment delivers solid performance at significantly lower price points and can be purchased without subscription commitments.
The hardware decision depends heavily on your operational environment and budget priorities. High-volume kitchens with heavy equipment usage typically benefit from Toast’s specialized durability, while counter-service operations or those with protected hardware placement might find Square’s affordable options perfectly adequate.
Processing fees represent one of your largest ongoing technology expenses, making fee structures a critical comparison factor. Square maintains transparent, consistent pricing across all transactions: 2.6% + 10¢ for in-person payments on paid plans (2.6% + 15¢ on the free plan) and 2.9% + 30¢ for online orders. These rates apply uniformly to all card types, including American Express, with no hidden charges or monthly processing minimums.
Toast’s processing structure is more complex and less predictable. Their standard plans offer rates starting at 2.49% + 15¢ for in-person transactions, but this can increase to 3.09% + 15¢ or higher on pay-as-you-go plans. American Express transactions incur higher rates (3.29% + 15¢), and online ordering carries premium pricing at 3.5% + 15¢. While Toast’s advertised base rates appear competitive, the variable structure and additional fees often result in higher overall processing costs.
Cash flow management also differs significantly between platforms. Square provides instant access to funds through Square Checking accounts at no additional cost, while Toast typically requires 1-2 business days for standard deposits unless you pay extra for expedited transfers. For restaurants managing tight cash flow cycles, Square’s immediate fund availability provides a substantial operational advantage without additional costs.
While Toast and Square excel at in-restaurant operations, modern restaurants need comprehensive solutions that extend beyond POS functionality. Loman offers a specialized AI for restaurants approach that complements these POS systems by handling one of the most critical yet often overlooked aspects of restaurant operations: phone communication and customer service.
Loman’s 24/7 AI phone agent transforms how restaurants handle customer calls, orders, and inquiries. Unlike general-purpose POS systems, Loman integrates seamlessly with existing POS infrastructure including Square, Toast, and Clover systems, creating a unified operational ecosystem. The AI agent comes pre-trained on restaurant menus, policies, and customer preferences, ensuring accurate order taking and customer service that matches your brand standards. This specialized focus on phone operations reduces missed calls, shortens customer wait times, and directly improves sales conversion rates.
The platform provides built-in analytics and real-time insights specifically designed for restaurant decision-making, offering visibility into call patterns, order trends, and customer preferences that complement the operational data from Toast or Square. What sets Loman apart is its implementation speed—restaurants can be live with the system in under a day—and its scalability across single locations, chains, and franchise operations. While Toast and Square focus on in-restaurant efficiency, Loman addresses the external communication challenges that directly impact customer acquisition and retention.
Digital ordering capabilities have become essential for restaurant survival and growth. Toast offers comprehensive online ordering solutions as add-on services beyond their base subscription costs. Their system excels in menu organization with sophisticated category grouping and the ability to maintain separate menus for in-store versus online customers. Toast’s standout feature is its intelligent order timing system that adjusts preparation estimates based on kitchen capacity, order complexity, and historical data analytics.
Square includes online ordering functionality across all plans—including their free tier—making it exceptionally cost-effective for restaurants prioritizing digital sales channels. Their system can import existing menus from websites or PDFs, though the process isn’t always seamless. While Square’s online ordering interface provides solid customer experience and ease of use, it offers fewer customization options for restaurants seeking to fine-tune their digital ordering presentation.
Both platforms integrate effectively with major third-party delivery services like DoorDash and Uber Eats, but Toast’s restaurant specialization provides more comprehensive delivery management tools. Restaurants heavily invested in takeout and delivery operations may find Toast’s advanced kitchen coordination and order timing features worth the additional investment, while those exploring digital ordering for the first time might appreciate Square’s inclusive, no-additional-cost approach.
Restaurant success increasingly depends on data-driven operational decisions, making analytics capabilities a crucial differentiator. Toast delivers exceptional restaurant-specific reporting that breaks down sales performance by quantity, pricing, menu categories, and time periods with impressive granularity. Their comparative reporting across locations, days of the week, and seasonal patterns helps identify optimization opportunities that directly impact profitability. Toast’s labor analytics particularly shine with detailed staff productivity metrics and precise cost percentage calculations.
Square provides solid fundamental reporting through an intuitive dashboard that makes basic insights accessible to operators without extensive data analysis experience. Their system offers clear sales breakdowns, inventory tracking, and employee performance metrics that cover essential operational needs. However, restaurants seeking granular analysis of food costs, recipe profitability, or complex labor optimization may find Square’s reporting capabilities somewhat limited compared to Toast’s specialized approach.
Both systems enable report customization and data export for further analysis, but Toast’s reporting suite demonstrates clear advantages for restaurants prioritizing comprehensive operational analysis. Operations seeking accessible basic insights without complexity might prefer Square’s straightforward reporting approach.
Building customer loyalty represents a significant revenue opportunity for restaurants through increased visit frequency and higher average check sizes. Toast offers sophisticated loyalty program capabilities as paid add-ons, with pricing typically provided after subscription consultation. Their system supports complex reward structures including visit-based or spend-based accrual options, customizable redemption rules, and special occasion rewards for birthdays and anniversaries.
Square’s loyalty program also requires additional payment but offers more transparent pricing based on monthly reward visit volume. Their system allows customization of earning rates and redemption values, though with somewhat less flexibility than Toast’s offerings. Square’s automatic customer profile creation captures purchase history and preferences regardless of formal loyalty program activation, creating valuable marketing data for personalized promotion efforts.
Both platforms offer email marketing capabilities as separate add-ons for promoting specials, events, and loyalty programs. Toast’s deeper restaurant integration enables more sophisticated reward structures tied to specific menu items or categories, while Square’s straightforward approach works well for simple punch-card style programs. The choice depends on your desired loyalty program complexity and budget allocation for customer retention initiatives.
Pricing represents one of the most significant differences between these platforms. Square offers a permanently free plan with surprisingly comprehensive features, making it accessible to new restaurants with limited startup capital. Their paid plans (Plus at $69/month and Premium at $165/month) add advanced functionality without requiring long-term commitments, operating exclusively on month-to-month terms with no cancellation penalties.
Toast’s pricing model is considerably more complex and commitment-heavy. While they offer a “Starter Kit” with limited functionality and no monthly software fee, this option requires accepting higher payment processing rates. Standard plans start at $69/month for basic Point of Sale functionality, with numerous feature add-ons for online ordering, loyalty programs, and inventory management that can substantially increase monthly costs. Most concerning for many restaurant owners, Toast typically requires two-year contract commitments with early termination penalties.
Hardware costs amplify these differences dramatically. Square allows using existing iPads or purchasing equipment outright with optional financing, while Toast requires proprietary equipment at premium price points. The contract commitment represents a particular concern in the restaurant industry’s volatile environment, making Square’s flexibility and transparent pricing advantageous for businesses prioritizing adaptability.
Toast’s restaurant specialization becomes most apparent in advanced operational features designed for complex service models. Their table management system provides comprehensive floor layout control, reservation integration, and wait time optimization tools essential for full-service establishments. Toast’s kitchen display system (KDS) excels with advanced ticket timing, production metrics, multilingual support, and sophisticated coursing capabilities that coordinate food timing for optimal guest experiences.
Square offers solid restaurant fundamentals but lacks some specialized features that differentiate Toast. Their table management functions adequately for basic needs but provides less sophistication for complex floor layouts or advanced reservation systems. Square’s KDS handles essential ticket management effectively but without Toast’s advanced timing analytics and production optimization tools.
Both systems manage essential restaurant functions like check splitting, item modifications, and time-based menu switching competently. However, Toast’s deeper specialization becomes valuable in specific scenarios involving large party management, complex split billing, and detailed kitchen communication requirements. Restaurants with elaborate service models will likely appreciate Toast’s restaurant-centric approach, while operations with straightforward needs may find Square entirely sufficient without paying for unused advanced features.
Customer support quality significantly impacts your restaurant’s technology experience, particularly during critical service periods. Toast provides 24/7 support across all plan levels, including their free option—a substantial advantage for an industry operating during non-standard business hours. Their implementation includes personalized onsite training and setup assistance, though user experiences during this critical phase can vary inconsistently.
Square offers 24/7 support only on Plus and Premium plans, with limited hours for free plan users. Their support philosophy emphasizes comprehensive online resources, community forums, and email assistance rather than direct phone support. Square’s implementation is designed for self-service setup using intuitive interfaces and detailed documentation, making it accessible for technically comfortable operators but potentially challenging for those requiring hands-on guidance.
Implementation timelines differ substantially between platforms. Square can be operational within hours or days through their streamlined self-service approach, while Toast typically requires weeks of planning, menu configuration, and scheduled professional installation. The choice depends on whether you value rapid deployment and self-sufficiency or prefer structured, professional implementation support despite longer timelines.
Your decision between Toast and Square should align with your restaurant’s operational complexity, budget priorities, and growth trajectory. Toast represents the superior choice for full-service restaurants with sophisticated operations, particularly those requiring advanced kitchen management, detailed analytics, and specialized hardware durability. The comprehensive feature set and restaurant specialization justify higher costs and contract commitments for operations that will fully utilize these capabilities.
Square stands as the better option for new restaurants, quick-service establishments, cafes, and operations prioritizing flexibility and cost control. The free starting option, transparent pricing structure, month-to-month terms, and immediate fund access provide significant advantages for businesses with straightforward needs or uncertain operational futures. Square’s cross-industry capabilities also benefit restaurants with retail components or those potentially expanding beyond traditional food service.
Consider both your immediate requirements and your three-to-five-year business vision when making this critical technology decision. Restaurants anticipating rapid growth, multiple locations, or increasingly complex operations might benefit from investing in Toast’s specialized platform despite higher initial costs. Conversely, businesses prioritizing financial flexibility or exploring different service concepts might appreciate Square’s adaptability and lower commitment requirements.
The ideal POS system isn’t universally superior but rather the one that best matches your specific business model, service style, operational priorities, and budget constraints. For restaurants seeking the ultimate efficiency boost, consider how specialized solutions like Loman can complement your chosen POS system, providing comprehensive call management and customer service automation that drives revenue growth while reducing operational complexity across single locations, chains, and franchise operations.
Enter your information in the form to receive a call from Loman and place an order like a customer would!
