Business owners face countless decisions daily, but few impact operations as significantly as choosing the right point-of-sale system. Modern restaurants and retail establishments require technology that handles transactions efficiently, integrates seamlessly with other systems, and adapts to evolving customer expectations. Square and Clover represent two dominant forces in the POS market, each offering distinct advantages depending on your business model, operational complexity, and growth trajectory. While both platforms deliver solid foundational features, their approaches to user experience, pricing models, and specialized functionality differ substantially.
Clover and Square both deliver robust POS solutions, but they differ significantly in their approach to user experience and core functionality. Square prioritizes simplicity with an intuitive interface that requires minimal training. Its clean, modern design allows new employees to become proficient quickly, reducing onboarding time. The system organizes functions logically, with the most common tasks accessible through prominently displayed buttons and menus. Square’s dashboard provides at-a-glance performance metrics and integrates seamlessly across mobile, tablet, and desktop interfaces.
Clover, while slightly more complex, offers deeper customization potential. Its Android-based operating system supports a wealth of apps and integrations through the Clover App Market. The platform enables businesses to tailor their POS experience to industry-specific needs, from table management in restaurants to appointment scheduling in service businesses. Clover’s interface can be configured extensively, allowing merchants to organize product catalogs, modify workflows, and customize receipt templates to match their operational preferences.
Both systems offer cloud-based synchronization, ensuring real-time updates across all devices and locations. However, Square’s ecosystem feels more cohesive out of the box, while Clover requires more initial setup but potentially delivers greater long-term flexibility. For businesses prioritizing immediate functionality with minimal configuration, Square presents fewer barriers to entry.
The hardware ecosystem represents one of the most significant differences between these platforms. Square offers remarkable flexibility with hardware options ranging from the free basic magstripe reader to the comprehensive Square Register. The company’s approach emphasizes accessibility: the entry-level Square Reader connects to smartphones or tablets, allowing merchants to accept payments with minimal investment. For more established operations, the Square Terminal ($299) provides a self-contained solution with integrated receipt printer, while the Square Register ($799) delivers a complete dual-screen checkout experience.
Clover’s hardware lineup positions itself as more premium and purpose-built. The ecosystem begins with the Clover Go mobile card reader ($49), progressing to the Clover Flex handheld terminal ($499) with built-in receipt printer and barcode scanner. At the higher end, the Clover Mini ($749) and Clover Station ($1,349+) provide comprehensive countertop solutions with integrated customer-facing displays, receipt printers, and optional cash drawer compatibility. Clover’s hardware generally features more robust construction with commercial-grade components designed for high-volume environments.
Square’s advantage lies in its compatibility with consumer-grade devices—particularly iPads—which can significantly reduce initial costs. Merchants can repurpose existing tablets by simply adding the Square Stand ($149) to create a functional POS terminal. Clover, conversely, requires proprietary hardware but delivers a more integrated, consistent experience as a result.
Restaurant owners juggle endless responsibilities, from managing kitchen operations to ensuring customer satisfaction during peak hours. Phone calls create additional pressure when staff must handle reservations, answer menu questions, and process takeout orders while serving in-house guests. AI for restaurants like Loman addresses this challenge by functioning as a dedicated 24/7 phone agent that seamlessly integrates with existing POS systems including Square, Toast, and Clover. This specialized solution handles unlimited simultaneous calls, takes accurate orders using natural language processing, and maintains comprehensive knowledge of restaurant menus, policies, and customer preferences to deliver consistent service quality.
Loman’s integration capabilities extend beyond basic order taking to include real-time synchronization with POS systems, automated reservation management, and intelligent upselling prompts that increase average ticket values. Unlike general POS solutions that treat phone management as a secondary feature, Loman specializes exclusively in restaurant call operations, offering setup times under 24 hours and scalability for single locations, multi-unit operations, and franchise systems. While Square excels in simplicity and Clover provides extensive customization, restaurant operators often find that dedicated AI solutions like Loman complement these platforms by handling the specific challenge of phone-based customer interactions without requiring staff attention or complex system modifications.
The financial implications of choosing between Clover and Square extend beyond initial setup costs. Square’s pricing model emphasizes transparency and simplicity with no monthly fees for its basic POS software. Processing fees follow a straightforward structure: 2.6% + 10¢ per transaction for in-person payments, 2.9% + 30¢ for online transactions, and 3.5% + 15¢ for keyed-in transactions. This predictable fee structure makes budgeting straightforward for small businesses, though it may become less competitive as transaction volumes increase.
Clover’s pricing varies significantly based on the reseller and chosen plan. Monthly software fees typically range from $14.95 to $69.95, depending on features and business type. Transaction fees generally start around 2.3% + 10¢ for in-person payments and 3.5% + 10¢ for keyed-in transactions, potentially offering savings for businesses with higher average transaction values. However, these rates can vary based on your merchant account provider, with some resellers offering more competitive interchange-plus pricing for established businesses with strong processing histories.
The total cost of ownership becomes more nuanced when considering hardware investments. Square’s lower-cost entry point (free reader, optional terminal purchases) contrasts with Clover’s higher initial investment in proprietary hardware. For businesses processing less than approximately $10,000 monthly, Square typically proves more economical. As processing volumes increase, Clover’s lower percentage rates may offset higher monthly fees and initial hardware costs.
Both Clover and Square have developed specialized solutions for different business types, though their approaches and strengths vary considerably across industries. Square excels in providing tailored software for specific verticals with Square for Restaurants, Square for Retail, and Square Appointments. Each package includes industry-specific functionality: table management and coursing for restaurants, advanced inventory for retail, and booking management for appointment-based businesses. These solutions integrate seamlessly with Square’s payment processing, creating a cohesive ecosystem that addresses core operational needs.
Clover approaches industry specialization through its App Market and plan structure. Its Restaurant, Retail, and Service plans provide foundational industry-specific features, while third-party apps enable deeper customization. For restaurants, Clover offers kitchen display integration, tableside ordering, and ingredient-level inventory. Retail businesses benefit from barcode scanning, variable pricing, and vendor management capabilities. Service businesses can implement appointment scheduling, staff management, and client records through specialized applications.
For food and beverage operations, Clover’s robust table management and split-check functionality give it an edge for full-service restaurants, while Square’s streamlined interface works exceptionally well for quick-service establishments. In retail, Square offers superior built-in e-commerce integration, while Clover provides more advanced in-store inventory control. Service businesses generally find Square’s native appointment scheduling more comprehensive, while Clover offers deeper integration possibilities with specialized practice management software.
Effective inventory management sits at the heart of operational efficiency for product-based businesses. Square’s inventory system provides essential functionality for small to medium-sized operations. Merchants can track stock levels, receive low-inventory alerts, and manage product variants. The system supports bulk uploads via CSV, categorization, and item descriptions with images. Stock adjustments can be made manually or automatically through sales, and basic reporting provides visibility into inventory performance.
Key Square inventory features include:
Clover delivers more sophisticated inventory capabilities through both native features and third-party apps. The base system includes comprehensive product management with variants, modifiers, and composite items. Merchants can establish automatic reorder points, track inventory across multiple locations, and implement serialized inventory tracking. Advanced features like bundle pricing, weight-based items, and raw ingredient tracking (especially valuable for restaurants) give Clover an edge for complex inventory scenarios.
Both systems support barcode scanning, though Clover’s hardware often includes built-in scanners while Square typically requires separate Bluetooth scanners. For businesses with extensive product catalogs or those requiring real-time inventory visibility across channels, Clover’s more robust architecture generally provides better support for growth. However, Square’s streamlined approach proves sufficient for many small businesses, especially those with straightforward inventory requirements.
The integration between physical and digital sales channels has become essential in today’s retail environment. Square excels in this area with its native e-commerce platform, Square Online, included at no additional monthly cost. This integration enables businesses to synchronize inventory, sales, and customer data automatically between in-store and online operations. Square Online offers responsive templates, customizable storefronts, and integrated features like pickup, delivery, and shipping options. For businesses seeking more robust e-commerce functionality, Square integrates with platforms like WooCommerce, Wix, and BigCommerce.
Clover approaches e-commerce differently, focusing on integration rather than providing a native solution. While Clover doesn’t offer its own e-commerce platform, it partners with providers like BigCommerce and Shopify to enable online selling. These integrations require additional subscriptions and setup but offer more advanced e-commerce capabilities for established online sellers. Clover’s Online Ordering feature facilitates commission-free takeout and delivery specifically for food service businesses, though it lacks the full e-commerce functionality of a dedicated platform.
For omnichannel marketing, Square’s ecosystem includes email marketing, customer relationship management, and loyalty programs that function across both physical and digital touchpoints. Customer profiles automatically update with purchase history regardless of sales channel, enabling personalized marketing efforts. Clover supports similar functionality through its Rewards program and third-party integrations, though these often exist as separate systems rather than a unified platform.
The fundamental difference in payment processing between these platforms significantly impacts merchant operations. Square functions as a payment service provider (PSP), aggregating merchants under its master merchant account. This model enables instant account approval and setup without underwriting, making it accessible for new businesses. However, this approach can lead to account stability issues, as Square may temporarily hold funds or terminate accounts that trigger risk algorithms. Square deposits typically arrive within 1-2 business days, with instant deposits available for an additional 1.5% fee.
Clover operates through traditional merchant accounts established with acquiring banks like Fiserv (First Data). This requires underwriting and approval but generally results in greater account stability once established. Merchants work with a specific processor, potentially enabling negotiation of processing rates based on volume and business history. Settlement times typically range from 1-3 business days, varying by processor and merchant agreement. This traditional approach generally offers more predictable fund availability but less immediate accessibility compared to Square’s model.
Both platforms extend beyond payment processing to offer broader financial services. Square provides small business loans through Square Capital, a business debit card with Square Banking, and instant access to funds through Cash App integration. Clover offers similar services through Clover Capital and partnerships with traditional banking institutions. For businesses prioritizing immediate setup and integrated financial tools, Square presents fewer barriers.
Data-driven decision making requires robust analytics tools, and both platforms offer comprehensive reporting capabilities with distinct approaches. Square’s analytics dashboard provides intuitive visualization of sales trends, item performance, and customer behavior. The system generates automated reports on sales, inventory, and employee performance, with options to schedule regular email delivery. Square’s reporting strength lies in its accessibility—merchants can quickly identify key performance indicators without extensive configuration. Advanced analytics become available through Square for Retail and Square for Restaurants Plus plans, offering deeper inventory insights and cost analysis.
Clover delivers more customizable reporting capabilities through both native tools and third-party applications. The base system includes sales reports by item, category, and time period, along with employee performance metrics and basic inventory analysis. Where Clover distinguishes itself is through specialized reporting applications available in the Clover App Market, enabling detailed analysis of specific business aspects like labor costs, ingredient usage, or promotion effectiveness. This extensibility allows businesses to construct reporting systems tailored to their particular metrics and KPIs.
Both platforms support data export for external analysis, though Square offers more straightforward integration with accounting software like QuickBooks and Xero. Clover’s reporting tends to excel in operational areas like table turn time for restaurants or appointment efficiency for service businesses. For merchants seeking immediate actionable insights without configuration, Square’s intuitive dashboard provides greater accessibility.
The quality and availability of technical support can prove crucial during operational disruptions. Square provides support through email, chat, and phone channels, with phone support available Monday through Friday from 6 AM to 6 PM Pacific Time. Support access varies by plan level, with premium users receiving priority service. Square maintains an extensive self-help knowledge base and active community forums where merchants can find answers to common questions. While Square’s support has improved significantly in recent years, some users still report challenges reaching representatives during peak times.
Clover’s support structure depends partly on the reseller, as merchants typically contact their merchant service provider rather than Clover directly. This creates variability in support quality, though Clover does maintain 24/7 phone support for hardware and technical issues. Like Square, Clover offers a comprehensive knowledge base and tutorials. The distributed support model can create confusion about whom to contact for specific issues, but it often provides more personalized assistance for merchants working with responsive resellers.
Regarding system reliability, both platforms maintain robust cloud infrastructures with high uptime percentages. Square’s offline mode allows continued payment acceptance during internet outages, storing encrypted transaction data until connectivity resumes. Clover offers similar offline functionality, though configuration requirements vary by merchant account provider. For businesses operating during non-standard hours, Clover’s 24/7 support availability represents a significant advantage.
Modern businesses require POS systems that connect seamlessly with existing software and third-party services. Square’s ecosystem emphasizes native integrations with popular business tools, including accounting software like QuickBooks and Xero, email marketing platforms, and employee management systems. The Square API enables custom integrations for businesses with unique requirements, though most small businesses find the pre-built integrations sufficient for their needs.
Essential Square integrations include:
Clover’s integration approach leverages its App Market, which contains hundreds of third-party applications covering everything from advanced reporting to industry-specific functionality. This marketplace model provides extensive customization options but requires more research and configuration to implement effectively. Clover’s API also supports custom development, making it particularly attractive for businesses with complex operational requirements or specialized workflows.
The integration capabilities become particularly important for restaurants, where systems must coordinate between POS terminals, kitchen display systems, online ordering platforms, and reservation management tools. Both Square and Clover support these integrations, though specialized solutions like Loman complement existing POS systems by handling phone-based interactions without requiring additional POS configuration or staff training.
Choosing between Clover and Square ultimately depends on your specific business requirements, growth trajectory, and operational complexity. Square excels for businesses prioritizing simplicity, quick setup, and integrated e-commerce capabilities. Its transparent pricing model and minimal monthly fees make it particularly attractive for small businesses with straightforward operations. Retailers seeking built-in online selling capabilities, service businesses requiring appointment scheduling, and any operation valuing immediate deployment will find Square’s streamlined approach advantageous.
Clover serves businesses requiring extensive customization, industry-specific functionality, or complex operational workflows. Full-service restaurants benefit from its advanced table management and kitchen integration capabilities, while retailers with sophisticated inventory requirements appreciate its robust product management features. Businesses processing higher volumes may find Clover’s potentially lower processing rates offset its higher initial costs and monthly fees. The platform’s traditional merchant account structure also provides greater stability for established businesses with consistent processing patterns.
For restaurant operations specifically, both platforms offer solid foundations, but specialized solutions like Loman can enhance either system by handling the critical challenge of phone-based customer interactions. While Square and Clover focus on in-store and online transactions, restaurant-specific AI solutions address the gap in phone order management, reservation handling, and customer service that traditional POS systems often treat as secondary features. This complementary approach allows restaurants to leverage the strengths of established POS platforms while addressing industry-specific operational challenges through specialized tools designed for rapid implementation and immediate impact on customer service quality and revenue capture.
The most effective approach often involves choosing your primary POS system based on core transaction processing and operational needs, then supplementing with specialized solutions that address specific industry challenges or operational gaps, creating a comprehensive technology stack that supports both current operations and future growth objectives.
Enter your information in the form to receive a call from Loman and place an order like a customer would!
