Choosing the right point-of-sale (POS) system is crucial for restaurant success in today’s competitive landscape. Two prominent contenders, Aloha POS and Square, offer comprehensive solutions but cater to different operational needs with varying features, pricing structures, and technical capabilities. This detailed comparison will help restaurant owners make an informed decision based on their specific business requirements.
Aloha POS, developed by NCR Voyix, has established itself as a traditional powerhouse serving over 75,000 restaurants worldwide. Its reputation centers on reliability and comprehensive features specifically designed for mid-size to large operations and established chains. The system excels in complex restaurant environments where advanced functionality takes precedence over simplicity. Aloha’s hybrid cloud architecture ensures continuous operation even during internet outages, making it particularly valuable for high-volume establishments where downtime equals significant revenue loss.
Square has revolutionized the POS landscape with its cloud-based, user-friendly approach that appeals to small businesses, startups, and establishments seeking modern, scalable solutions. With transparent pricing and an intuitive interface, Square has gained popularity among restaurant owners who prioritize flexibility and affordability. The platform’s design philosophy emphasizes accessibility and ease of use, making it immediately familiar to users accustomed to contemporary mobile applications. Square’s continuous evolution through regular software updates ensures restaurants stay current with industry trends without additional investment.
The fundamental difference lies in their target markets and design philosophies. Aloha focuses on feature depth and operational complexity, while Square prioritizes user experience and streamlined functionality. This distinction influences every aspect of these systems, from pricing structures to training requirements. Understanding these core differences helps restaurant owners align their choice with both current needs and future growth plans.
Aloha POS delivers robust, restaurant-specific features designed for full-service establishments requiring sophisticated functionality. Its comprehensive toolset includes advanced table management with detailed coursing features, sophisticated inventory tracking, and extensive menu customization capabilities. The system handles complex modifications and special requests with ease, while its kitchen display system (KDS) facilitates seamless communication between front and back-of-house operations. Aloha’s hybrid cloud capability ensures critical data remains protected during hardware failures, enabling continuous operation even when internet connectivity becomes unreliable.
Square offers streamlined functionality without compromising essential restaurant operations. The platform includes comprehensive menu management, table and seat management, customizable floor plans, and split check capabilities that address most restaurant needs. Square’s particular strengths emerge in digital ordering options, including integrated online ordering, QR code payments, and contactless dining experiences that have become increasingly important. Additional features like order-ready text notifications and automatic gratuity options for larger parties enhance customer experience while reducing staff workload.
Both systems provide robust reporting capabilities with different approaches to data analysis. Aloha generates hundreds of customizable reports that can be scheduled and automated, offering deep insights into operational performance. Square delivers real-time sales reporting accessible from anywhere, with particularly strong labor cost analysis and sales trend identification. The reporting choice depends on whether you prefer comprehensive historical analysis or real-time operational insights.
While traditional POS systems handle in-store operations effectively, many restaurants struggle with phone order management and customer service during peak hours. Loman’s specialized AI for restaurants addresses this critical gap by providing 24/7 automated phone support specifically designed for restaurant operations. Unlike general-purpose POS systems, Loman integrates seamlessly with existing systems like Square, Toast, and Clover while focusing exclusively on optimizing phone-based customer interactions.
Loman’s AI technology is trained on individual restaurant menus, policies, and customer preferences, ensuring accurate order taking and consistent customer service regardless of time or staff availability. The system reduces missed calls that typically result in lost revenue, shortens customer wait times, and often increases average order values through intelligent upselling suggestions. Built-in analytics provide real-time insights into call patterns, peak hours, and customer preferences, enabling data-driven decisions that complement existing POS reporting. Fast setup means restaurants can be live in under a day, and the solution scales efficiently from single locations to multi-location businesses or franchise operations.
Aloha POS operates on a hybrid system architecture combining on-premise components with cloud functionality. This traditional approach utilizes local servers that store data on-site while synchronizing with cloud servers for remote access capability. Hardware requirements are more specific, typically requiring proprietary NCR terminals and equipment, which reduces flexibility but potentially increases reliability in high-volume environments. This architecture allows full functionality during internet outages, though at higher hardware costs—generally around $1,000 per terminal plus additional server and specialized equipment expenses.
Square employs a predominantly cloud-based approach, storing data remotely and making it accessible through any internet-connected device. This architecture significantly reduces upfront hardware costs and maintenance requirements while offering greater flexibility in device selection. Square works with various hardware options including iPads and Android devices, though it also offers purpose-built hardware like Square Register and Square Terminal. Hardware costs typically start under $100 for basic readers, with complete setups ranging from $600 to several thousand dollars depending on selected components.
The architectural choice impacts long-term operational considerations beyond initial costs. Aloha’s system provides robust stability for establishments where consistent uptime is critical, while Square’s approach enables modern integrations and remote management capabilities that appeal to tech-savvy operators.
Aloha POS operates on a less transparent pricing model requiring direct consultation with sales representatives for custom quotes. Initial investment typically requires approximately $1,000 per terminal, plus additional costs for servers, installation, and comprehensive training programs. Monthly subscription fees generally start around $175 per terminal, with payment processing fees averaging 2.25% plus $0.15 per transaction for premium plans. Additional ongoing costs include maintenance fees, software updates, and dedicated support services that can significantly impact total ownership expenses.
Square provides transparent, tiered pricing that eliminates guesswork in budget planning. The Free plan charges no monthly subscription but applies 2.6% plus $0.15 for in-person transactions. The Plus plan costs $69 monthly per location with reduced processing fees of 2.5% plus $0.15, while the Premium plan costs $165 monthly with 2.4% plus $0.15 transaction fees. Square’s hardware costs remain generally lower, with options ranging from complimentary card readers to comprehensive solutions like Square Register at approximately $799. Unlike Aloha, Square includes software updates and basic support without additional charges.
Cost-effectiveness varies significantly based on transaction volume and operational complexity. Small to medium restaurants typically find Square more economical, especially establishments processing lower transaction volumes or those in startup phases. The absence of long-term contracts provides operational flexibility that many restaurant owners value. Conversely, Aloha may offer superior value for larger operations with high transaction volumes where the robust feature set and operational stability justify higher investment costs.
User experience differences between Aloha and Square directly impact staff training requirements and operational efficiency. Aloha POS offers powerful but complex interface capabilities that typically require substantial training investment. While highly customizable and capable of handling sophisticated restaurant operations, this functionality comes with a steeper learning curve requiring several days of formal training for new staff proficiency. However, Aloha’s widespread industry presence provides an advantage—many experienced restaurant employees have prior familiarity with the system, potentially reducing training time for seasoned hires.
Square presents an intuitive, modern interface designed for immediate usability. Its clean, minimalist design follows contemporary mobile application standards, making it instantly familiar to most users. New staff often achieve operational competency after just a few hours of training, with full proficiency typically achieved within days rather than weeks. Square’s design philosophy prioritizes accessibility through contextual help and guided workflows that facilitate natural on-the-job learning, particularly beneficial for establishments with high staff turnover or part-time employees.
Training resource approaches differ significantly between systems. Aloha provides comprehensive training programs often delivered by industry-experienced trainers, valuable for complex operational requirements. Square offers extensive self-service resources including videos, tutorials, and searchable knowledge bases, complemented by 24/7 support for Plus and Premium subscribers. Square’s materials are designed for consumption in focused segments, allowing flexible, self-paced learning that accommodates varying staff schedules.
The primary consideration involves aligning system complexity with operational needs and staff capabilities. Full-service restaurants with intricate workflows might benefit from Aloha’s comprehensive capabilities despite longer training periods, while quick-service establishments or those with streamlined operations might find Square’s approach more efficient and cost-effective from both training and operational perspectives.
Both systems offer extensive integration capabilities but approach ecosystem connectivity differently. Aloha POS leverages its industry history with over 200 third-party integrations covering comprehensive restaurant management aspects. These include major accounting software platforms like QuickBooks and Great Plains, payroll systems including ADP and Millennium, sophisticated inventory management solutions, customer loyalty programs, and various online ordering platforms. Aloha’s integration framework particularly excels in enterprise-level connections, though some integrations may require additional configuration or development investments.
Square has developed a modern, open API-based ecosystem with a rapidly growing integration partner network. The system connects seamlessly with popular delivery services, enabling restaurants to manage multiple delivery channels through a single interface. Square integrates effectively with major accounting platforms, employee management systems, and inventory solutions through its App Marketplace, providing one-click integration that simplifies connection processes compared to Aloha’s sometimes more complex requirements.
A fundamental distinction emerges in payment processing approaches. Aloha works with various payment processors, offering flexibility but potentially complicating integration processes and fee structures. Square functions as both POS and payment processor, providing a streamlined all-in-one solution that eliminates separate payment processing integration needs. This simplicity comes at the cost of processor flexibility—restaurants must use Square’s payment services with standard fee structures.
Customer support quality and accessibility becomes critical during busy service periods when technical issues can impact revenue. Aloha POS offers 24/7 customer support, though user experiences vary regarding response times and issue resolution effectiveness. Support typically flows through authorized resellers rather than directly from NCR, which can lead to inconsistent service quality depending on local dealer capabilities. However, Aloha’s support team often includes technicians with extensive restaurant industry experience, providing valuable context-specific assistance that understands operational urgencies. On-site support availability addresses critical issues, though this may incur additional costs depending on service agreements.
Square provides multi-channel support with availability dependent on subscription tier. Free plan users receive support Monday through Friday from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. PT, while Plus and Premium subscribers benefit from comprehensive 24/7 phone support. Square’s support approach emphasizes remote resolution through phone, email, and chat channels, with user reviews consistently praising responsiveness and problem-solving capabilities. The company has invested significantly in self-service resources including comprehensive documentation, troubleshooting guides, and active community forums that address common issues.
Notable philosophical differences emerge in support approaches. Aloha’s traditional model often involves technician visits for complex hardware issues, providing hands-on resolution but potentially longer response times. Square’s cloud-based approach emphasizes remote diagnostics and, when necessary, hardware replacement rather than on-site repair. This distinction impacts resolution timelines, with Square generally providing faster initial response but potentially longer resolution times for complex hardware problems requiring equipment replacement.
Restaurant owners should evaluate their technical self-sufficiency, the criticality of immediate support during operating hours, and preferences for in-person versus remote assistance. Operations with limited technical expertise might value Square’s user-friendly support approach and extensive self-help resources, while establishments requiring hands-on assistance for complex configurations might prefer Aloha’s more traditional, relationship-based support model.
Mobile functionality has become essential for restaurant operators requiring remote business management capabilities. Aloha POS offers mobile management through its dedicated application, providing access to key operational data including inventory levels, employee hours, hourly net sales, and various performance metrics. Restaurant owners can monitor employee clock-in status, view guest counts, and check table status remotely. However, users report limitations in mobile app capabilities compared to the full desktop interface, noting it’s primarily suitable for monitoring rather than comprehensive management functions.
Square delivers extensive mobile management capabilities through its robust mobile application ecosystem. Restaurant owners can access all business aspects from smartphones or tablets, including real-time sales data, inventory management, employee scheduling, and menu updates. The system enables complete remote management—owners can implement menu changes, adjust pricing, and modify operational settings from any location with internet access. Square’s mobile-first design philosophy ensures the mobile experience mirrors the desktop version with full functionality rather than limited feature subsets.
Both systems support tableside ordering and payment processing with different implementation approaches. Aloha provides dedicated mobile hardware optimized for restaurant environments but requiring specific devices and potentially higher costs. Square offers flexibility through standard iOS or Android devices running the Square POS app, potentially reducing hardware investments while maintaining functionality. Square’s mobile POS extends to customer-facing applications including self-ordering kiosks and QR code ordering systems that integrate directly with the main POS infrastructure.
For restaurant owners prioritizing operational flexibility and comprehensive remote management, Square’s mobile functionality typically provides advantages in accessibility and feature completeness. However, establishments requiring specialized hardware for high-volume environments with demanding durability requirements might prefer Aloha’s purpose-built mobile solutions despite some remote management limitations.
User reviews provide valuable insights into real-world operational experiences with both systems. Aloha POS receives generally positive feedback, earning an average rating of 4.26 out of 5 stars across verified user reviews. Restaurant owners frequently praise Aloha’s reliability in high-volume environments, comprehensive feature set, and robust table management capabilities that handle complex dining scenarios effectively. Specific strengths mentioned include straightforward installation processes and responsive technical support when issues arise. However, critics note limitations in mobile application functionality, describing it as suitable primarily for viewing daily sales rather than comprehensive remote management. Some users mention complexity in initial system setup and occasional service outages that impact operations.
Square POS garners stronger overall ratings, averaging 4.74 out of 5 stars across a broader range of verified user reviews. Restaurant owners consistently highlight Square’s intuitive interface, system trustworthiness, and exceptional ease in training new staff members. Reviewers specifically commend straightforward dashboard navigation, easily readable reports, and reasonable processing fees that don’t burden profitability. The system receives particular recognition for reliability and simplicity in onboarding new employees, critical factors for establishments with high staff turnover. Primary criticisms focus on hardware limitations, such as compatibility challenges between standard Square readers and newer mobile devices. Some users note difficulties tracking individual transactions during extremely high-volume periods.
Examining specific operational contexts reveals usage patterns. Full-service restaurant owners tend to favor Aloha for robust table management and advanced coursing features that support complex dining experiences. Quick-service and mobile food businesses often prefer Square for its simplicity, flexibility, and rapid deployment capabilities. Multiple-location operators frequently mention Square’s strengths in centralized management and consistent user experience across venues. Both systems receive recognition for reporting capabilities, though Square’s real-time accessibility earns particular praise from hands-on owner-operators who value immediate insights.
Selecting between Aloha POS and Square requires careful alignment of system strengths with your restaurant’s operational requirements, scale, and budget realities. Aloha POS presents compelling advantages for established, mid-size to large restaurants with complex operational demands and sophisticated workflow requirements. Its comprehensive feature set, advanced table management capabilities, and hybrid architecture provide operational stability for high-volume environments where consistency and uptime directly impact revenue. Restaurants with intricate workflows, extensive menu customization needs, or those operating in areas with unreliable internet connectivity benefit from Aloha’s robust capabilities despite higher investment and steeper learning curves.
Square offers an accessible, cost-effective solution particularly appealing to new restaurants, small to medium operations, and establishments prioritizing modern customer experiences and operational flexibility. Its transparent pricing structure, intuitive interface, and strong mobile capabilities make it ideal for restaurants with limited technical resources or those requiring operational agility. Square’s continuous evolution through regular feature updates ensures systems remain current with industry trends without requiring significant additional investment. Quick-service restaurants, cafes, food trucks, and establishments with straightforward operational models typically find Square’s streamlined approach perfectly suited to their needs.
Your long-term business trajectory should influence this critical decision. If you anticipate rapid growth, multiple locations, or increasingly complex operations, evaluate each system’s scalability and enterprise capabilities carefully. Factor in your staff’s technical proficiency, typical turnover rates, and training capacity when assessing ease of use requirements. Integration needs with existing business systems, particularly accounting, inventory management, and online ordering platforms, should also significantly influence your choice between these solutions.
For restaurants seeking to optimize customer service beyond traditional POS capabilities, solutions like Loman provide specialized AI-powered phone support that complements either system choice. With fast implementation and seamless integration capabilities, Loman scales efficiently whether you’re operating a single location, managing a growing chain, or overseeing franchise operations that demand consistent customer experience excellence.
Enter your information in the form to receive a call from Loman and place an order like a customer would!
