Business owners today face more payment processing options than ever before, yet the decision between systems like Square and Clover can make or break their operational efficiency and profit margins. With contactless payments becoming the norm and customers expecting seamless transactions whether they’re ordering in-person, online, or through mobile apps, selecting the right POS system extends far beyond simple credit card processing. Square and Clover have emerged as two dominant players in this competitive landscape, each offering distinct advantages depending on your business model and growth plans. While both systems provide comprehensive payment processing capabilities, their fee structures, hardware costs, and monthly subscriptions differ significantly. Understanding these differences becomes essential when calculating your total cost of ownership and long-term profitability.
Square disrupted the payment processing industry in 2009 with its revolutionary card reader that transformed any smartphone into a payment terminal. Today, Square has evolved into a comprehensive business ecosystem offering everything from payroll services to marketing tools. The platform’s greatest strength lies in its simplicity and transparency, with straightforward pricing that eliminates guesswork for business owners. Square operates on a month-to-month basis with no long-term contracts, giving businesses complete flexibility to change providers if their needs evolve.
Clover took a different approach when Fiserv acquired it in 2012, focusing on customizable hardware solutions and industry-specific features. Rather than offering a one-size-fits-all solution, Clover allows businesses to build tailored POS systems through its extensive app marketplace and varied hardware options. This flexibility comes at a cost, both literally and figuratively, as Clover typically requires higher upfront investments and more complex setup processes.
The fundamental difference between these platforms becomes apparent in their business models. Square prioritizes ease of use and transparent pricing to attract small businesses and startups, while Clover targets established businesses willing to invest more for specialized features and customization options. This distinction influences everything from their fee structures to their customer support approaches.
Square’s appeal centers on its transparent and predictable fee structure that eliminates the confusion often associated with payment processing. For in-person transactions using Square hardware, the company charges a flat rate of 2.6% plus 10 cents per transaction. This rate applies universally, whether customers pay with rewards credit cards, corporate cards, or standard debit cards, removing the complexity of trying to predict processing costs based on card types.
Online transactions carry a slightly higher fee of 2.9% plus 30 cents, reflecting the increased risk associated with card-not-present payments. Manually keyed-in transactions cost 3.5% plus 15 cents, which remains competitive for businesses that occasionally need to process payments without physical cards present. These rates provide predictability that helps business owners budget effectively without worrying about variable costs based on card types or processing methods.
Square’s processing fees vary by transaction type and payment method:
Clover’s pricing model operates differently than Square’s centralized approach, as the company works through a network of resellers, banks, and merchant service providers. This distribution strategy means pricing can vary significantly depending on where and how you purchase your Clover system. When buying directly from Clover, in-person transaction fees typically range from 2.3% to 2.6% plus 10 cents, with lower rates available on premium plans.
Unlike Square, Clover requires monthly software subscription fees in addition to transaction processing costs. These monthly fees vary based on the plan and features you select, ranging from $4.95 for basic Payments Plus to $69.95 for the comprehensive Table Service Restaurant plan. The Register Lite plan costs $9.95 monthly and includes inventory management and customer engagement tools, while the full Register plan provides enhanced features for $39.95 monthly.
Clover’s reseller network can be both an advantage and a complication for businesses. Some merchants can negotiate interchange-plus pricing through certain providers, potentially offering better rates than Square’s flat-rate structure for high-volume businesses. However, this flexibility also introduces the possibility of variable pricing, hidden fees, and long-term contracts that may not be immediately apparent during the sales process.
Restaurant owners know that managing phone calls during busy periods creates significant operational challenges. While Square and Clover excel at processing payments and managing in-person transactions, they don’t address the critical issue of missed calls and overwhelmed phone systems. This is where specialized solutions like Loman transform restaurant operations by providing a dedicated AI for restaurants phone agent that handles 100% of incoming calls around the clock. Loman seamlessly integrates with existing POS systems including Square, Toast, and Clover, ensuring that phone orders flow directly into your established workflow without requiring staff intervention or system changes.
Loman’s 24/7 AI phone agent eliminates the common problem of missed opportunities during peak hours when staff are focused on serving in-person customers. The system is custom-trained on each restaurant’s specific menu, pricing, policies, and customer preferences, ensuring accurate order-taking and consistent customer service. Beyond simple order processing, Loman provides built-in analytics and real-time insights that help restaurant owners understand call patterns, peak times, and customer preferences. The platform’s fast setup process gets businesses live in under a day, making it scalable for single locations or multi-location restaurant groups. While Square and Clover handle the payment processing and inventory management aspects of restaurant operations, Loman specifically addresses the communication and customer service challenges that traditional POS systems leave unresolved.
Hardware costs represent one of the most significant upfront expenses when implementing a new POS system. Square maintains its commitment to affordability with hardware options designed to minimize initial investment barriers. The basic Square Reader for magstripe payments comes free with new accounts, while the more advanced Square Reader for contactless and chip payments costs only $49. The Square Terminal, which provides a standalone payment solution, is priced at $299, and the comprehensive Square Register with customer-facing display costs $799.
Clover’s hardware portfolio targets businesses willing to invest more for specialized functionality and aesthetic appeal. The entry-level Clover Go mobile reader costs approximately $49, comparable to Square’s contactless reader. However, prices increase significantly for more advanced options: the Clover Flex handheld terminal costs around $499, the Clover Mini countertop system starts at $749, and the full-featured Clover Station ranges from $1,349 for the Solo version to $1,649 for the Duo with customer display.
The substantial price difference between comparable systems becomes clear when comparing full-featured options. Square’s Register at $799 provides comprehensive POS functionality at roughly half the cost of Clover’s Station Duo at $1,649. While Clover’s hardware often includes more customization options and industry-specific designs, businesses must weigh these benefits against the significantly higher initial investment required.
Square and Clover offer distinct hardware ecosystems with different price points and capabilities:
Square’s most compelling advantage for small businesses lies in its free basic software tier, which includes essential features like payment processing, basic inventory management, sales reporting, and digital receipts without any monthly subscription fees. This approach allows startups and small businesses to begin operations without ongoing software costs, using their revenue to fund growth rather than fixed monthly expenses.
For businesses requiring advanced features, Square offers premium tiers at $60 per month per location for both Square for Retail Plus and Square for Restaurants Plus. These plans include industry-specific features like advanced inventory management, vendor management, and kitchen display integration. The pricing remains transparent and predictable, with no hidden fees or surprise charges that might impact monthly budgets.
Clover requires monthly software fees for all its plans, creating an ongoing expense that must be factored into operational costs. The basic Payments Plus plan costs $4.95 monthly, Register Lite costs $9.95, the full Register plan costs $39.95, and restaurant-specific plans range up to $69.95 monthly for Table Service Restaurant features. Over a full year, these fees can add up to substantial amounts: a restaurant using Clover’s premium plan would pay over $800 annually in software fees alone, compared to Square’s free basic plan or $720 annually for premium restaurant features.
Square built its reputation on transparent pricing with no hidden fees, and this philosophy extends throughout its service offerings. The company charges no PCI compliance fees, statement fees, or account maintenance charges that might surprise business owners. However, Square does charge for premium add-on services like Square Payroll ($35 monthly plus $5 per employee), Square Marketing (starting at $15 monthly), and Square Loyalty (beginning at $45 monthly).
Clover’s fee structure becomes more complex due to its varied distribution model through different merchant service providers. Depending on your provider, you might encounter PCI compliance fees (typically $99 annually), monthly statement fees ($10-15), minimum processing requirements, batch fees, or early termination penalties. Many Clover apps also carry additional monthly subscription costs ranging from $9.95 to $29.95 each, which can quickly accumulate for businesses requiring multiple specialized applications.
Contract terms represent another significant difference between the platforms. Square operates on a month-to-month basis with no long-term commitments or cancellation fees, providing complete flexibility for businesses to change providers as their needs evolve. Many Clover arrangements involve multi-year contracts with substantial early termination fees, potentially locking businesses into relationships that may not serve their long-term interests.
The real-world impact of processing fees varies dramatically based on your business type and average transaction size. For retail businesses with higher-value transactions, Clover’s lower percentage rates on premium plans can provide meaningful savings. A business processing $100 transactions would pay $2.30 with Clover’s premium 2.3% rate versus $2.60 with Square’s standard rate, creating a 30-cent difference per transaction that adds up quickly for high-volume retailers.
Conversely, quick-service restaurants and coffee shops with smaller average tickets often find Square more economical despite slightly higher percentage rates. The fixed per-transaction fee becomes more significant with smaller sales, making Square’s structure more favorable for businesses with average transactions below $20. For example, on a $10 coffee order, the difference between 2.3% and 2.6% is only 3 cents, but the consistent 10-cent per-transaction fee remains constant regardless of which platform you choose.
Online sales present another consideration where Square typically offers better value. Square’s 2.9% plus 30 cents online processing fee often beats Clover’s 3.5% plus 10 cents rate, especially for higher-value online orders. A $75 online order would cost $2.48 with Square versus $2.75 with Clover, making Square the clear winner for businesses with significant e-commerce components.
Both Square and Clover offer extensive integration capabilities, but their approaches differ significantly in execution and cost structure. Square provides a comprehensive App Marketplace with hundreds of integrations across accounting, e-commerce, inventory management, and customer relationship categories. Popular integrations with QuickBooks Online, Shopify, and WooCommerce connect seamlessly, though businesses should budget for the separate costs of these third-party services.
Clover’s App Market features over 300 applications designed specifically for the Clover ecosystem, ranging from basic accounting tools to sophisticated restaurant management systems. The key difference lies in cost structure: many Clover apps carry additional monthly subscription fees ranging from $9.95 to $29.95 each. A restaurant might easily spend an extra $50-100 monthly on specialized apps for table management, online ordering, and advanced loyalty programs.
Integration quality also varies between platforms. Square’s integrations often work through APIs that may require some technical setup but generally provide reliable connections. Clover’s apps are purpose-built for its hardware and software ecosystem, potentially offering tighter integration but at the cost of additional monthly fees and potential vendor lock-in situations.
Popular business applications integrate differently across Square and Clover platforms:
Small businesses and startups typically find Square’s economics more attractive due to its free basic plan and lower hardware costs. A small restaurant processing $10,000 monthly with an average transaction of $25 would pay approximately $270 in processing fees with Square’s 2.6% rate. With no mandatory monthly software fees, total costs remain at $270 monthly, providing predictable budgeting without additional overhead expenses.
The same business using Clover with Register Lite would pay roughly $250 in processing fees with the 2.6% rate, plus $9.95 monthly software fee, totaling about $260 monthly. While slightly less expensive, this calculation assumes the business doesn’t need any additional Clover apps, which could quickly increase monthly costs beyond Square’s total.
Medium-sized businesses processing $50,000 monthly see different dynamics emerge. With Square for Retail Plus at $60 monthly and the reduced 2.5% rate, total monthly costs would be approximately $1,310. The equivalent Clover business using Register plan would pay about $1,190 in processing fees plus $39.95 monthly software, totaling roughly $1,230 and saving about $80 monthly. However, businesses must factor in Clover’s higher hardware costs and potential app expenses when calculating true total cost of ownership.
Beyond pure cost considerations, several factors should influence your decision between Square and Clover. Square excels in user experience with an intuitive interface requiring minimal training, making it ideal for businesses with high staff turnover or limited technical expertise. The platform’s ecosystem integration between hardware, software, and additional services creates seamless operations for businesses wanting comprehensive solutions from a single provider.
Clover’s strength lies in customization and industry-specific solutions that can be tailored precisely to unique business needs. Its extensive App Market allows businesses to build specialized POS systems, whether running full-service restaurants, retail stores, or service businesses. The platform also offers more hardware variety to match different business environments and aesthetic preferences, which may be important for customer-facing operations.
Customer support represents another crucial consideration in your decision-making process. Square provides email support for all users with phone support available for paid plans, while Clover’s support varies by merchant service provider but typically includes 24/7 phone support. For businesses operating outside standard business hours or requiring immediate assistance during peak periods, this support availability could be decisive.
The decision between Square and Clover ultimately depends on your specific business needs, growth trajectory, and operational priorities. Square offers compelling advantages for small businesses and startups with its transparent pricing, free basic software, and affordable hardware options. Its user-friendly interface and comprehensive ecosystem make it particularly suitable for businesses that value simplicity and want to avoid long-term commitments while maintaining predictable costs.
Clover provides greater customization and specialized features that can benefit established businesses willing to invest more upfront for tailored solutions. While generally involving higher initial costs and monthly fees, its lower processing rates on premium plans can provide savings for high-volume businesses. The platform’s flexibility and extensive app marketplace make it attractive for businesses with specific industry requirements or complex operational needs.
When evaluating your options, calculate your projected processing volume and average transaction size to determine which platform offers better long-term value for your specific situation. Consider not just immediate costs but also growth plans, feature requirements, customer support needs, and contract flexibility that will serve your business as it evolves. The right choice will align with both your current budget constraints and your long-term operational goals, providing a foundation for sustainable growth and improved customer service. For restaurants specifically, consider how solutions like Loman can complement your chosen POS system by handling the critical phone operations that traditional POS systems don’t address, creating a comprehensive solution that maximizes both efficiency and revenue opportunities. Whether you choose Square or Clover, adding specialized tools for phone management, customer service automation, and operational analytics can provide the competitive edge needed in today’s demanding restaurant environment.
Enter your information in the form to receive a call from Loman and place an order like a customer would!
